3 hours ago
11
The impact of the Covid pandemic on the NHS, which was already under significant pressure, was profound and enduring. The findings set out in the Covid inquiry report are distressing, but not surprising (NHS was ‘on brink of collapse’ during pandemic, Covid inquiry finds, 19 March). The impact on patients and staff was immeasurable.
The “precarious position” that the NHS was in before the pandemic was the result of neglect – and not just towards the NHS itself. For decades, the social care sector has operated in the shadow of the NHS: vital to the nation’s wellbeing, yet chronically underfunded and undervalued. Social care, being ill-prepared and ill-supported, could not act as the resilient partner the NHS needed at a moment of crisis.
Social care has always been a core part of the solution to NHS performance challenges. A properly resourced social care system enables people to live independently and stops needs escalating to the point where medical intervention becomes necessary.
When the pandemic hit, the extent to which social care had been overlooked as part of the solution became starkly apparent. Decisions made at pace, such as rapid hospital discharges without adequate testing or preparation, had harmful consequences.
Despite these challenges, the response of the health and social care sectors was marked by ingenuity and determination. If there is one lesson to carry forward, it is that the resilience of our NHS depends on the strength of the social care sector.
With huge reform programmes under way across both sectors, the upshot must be a more integrated, properly valued and sustainably funded social care system. This is essential to the future stability of the NHS. Another pandemic, or large-scale public health emergency, would expose the same weaknesses.
Gerard Crofton-Martin
Interim chief executive, Social Care Institute for Excellence
An unintended but serious consequence of Donald Trump’s war on Iran is the sparse coverage in the print, radio and TV media of the third report of the Covid-19 inquiry, which covers the “devastating” response by all healthcare systems to the pandemic. In quieter times, this report would have been plastered all over the media, leading to overwhelming pressure on politicians on all sides to ensure that government acted promptly to take all necessary steps to protect the country from the next pandemic.
The first crucial question is whether or not ministers will quietly let Heather Hallett’s report disappear into the long grass and be forgotten, allowing them to avoid making the difficult and costly decisions necessary to protect us in the future by a root-and-branch reform and restructuring of the nation’s healthcare systems. The second crucial question is who, if anyone, in the media will hold government to account in the long term?
John Robinson
Lichfield, Staffordshire
